I was disgusted Jan. 21 when I opened the Crimson White to find a quarter page of base political rhetoric under the heading “News.” Does a lecture given by Ron Robinson, president of the Young America’s Foundation, warrant a news story? Absolutely.
Would one expect quotes from a president of a politically aligned organization to express ideas that clearly lean towards one political agenda? Of course.
However, the absolute lack of balance was disgusting. I do not mean to suggest that Mr. Robinson should have been censored in the article so as not to project a political bias. But a quote such as, “Young Republicans should welcome civility, even though the left hasn’t been particularly civil toward people like you trying to speak your beliefs on college campuses,” should be presented next to a counterview.
Perhaps that view could come from a member of the College Democrats, which demonstrates the readiness of “the left” to facilitate a balanced debate. The article also blatantly states that, “the liberal agenda often beats around the bush,” and gives no mention of the counter opinion.
This “article” presented one small paragraph of objective “news” and the rest of a quarter page of political rhetoric. If it is worthy to be printed at all, then it belongs on the “Opinions” page.
If I want to hear political rhetoric, I will watch FOX News or MSNBC. When I read a newspaper, however, I expect objective news. Certainly, bias will inevitably appear in an article, especially one of this nature – but it is the rejection of this bias which is the gold standard of journalism.
I hope the Crimson White at least aspires to this standard, even if it may sometimes fail in its achievement.
Joey Gamble is a freshman majoring in English and French.