Foreign policy has defined American politics since 9/11, and since the start of Obama’s term, it has continued to dominate decision making. With the Arab Spring and, more recently, the direct attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi that killed four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador, this election campaign has seen the spotlight on international candidate lines. The recent unrest in Syria has put both candidates on the spot, as the world looks to America to assume a position. Closer to home, however, with deepening economic problems and modernizing military, the question of spending will ultimately dictate how many decisions are made.
Last September at Fort Bragg, N.C., Obama announced an end to the war in Iraq. For many, this was the defining event of the Bush era, and its conclusion signaled a different approach to policy in the Middle East. This has led to Obama’s pushing forward a date for all U.S. troops to be out of Afghanistan by 2014. Again, it’s not an easy call. The number of “green-on-blue,” or insider, attacks has increased significantly over the past few months, and some fear it could call for an early retreat or risk further casualties.
America has also been faced with the rising nuclear threat of Iran. The continued increase of its uranium enrichment program and refusal to cooperate with the International Atomic Agency has led to the toughest sanctions yet being put in place by Obama and the EU. He called for prohibits on all trade – exceptions being humanitarian aid, medical and some informational material such as films – and put a stop to oil transactions, as well as freezing assets. This has also drawn attention to the importance of keeping a strong relationship with Israel, a long-standing ally of the U.S.
In the past four years, America’s position has been drawn into increasing question, with the rise of China and the economic development of Latin America, and the U.S. will have to decide what role it wants to play within these powers. But for Americans, maintaining public safety is the main concern. Both candidates want to assure they will implement effective policies to maintain national security.
Monday night’s debate was dedicated to foreign policy, and the candidates made it clear there were many issues they agreed on. Both President Obama and Governor Romney agreed that America’s relationship with Israel was of utmost importance. They also agreed that the use of drones was not only necessary but also acceptable, and they agreed that to be a strong foreign force, the U.S. must first strengthen itself economically and domestically.
Where they differed was the size and scope of the military. Obama indicated he wanted to “maintain” the size and budget of the military, including support to veterans. Romney, however, pushed for an increase of the military, pumping more money into the military’s budget.
National security is a top priority for voters. The two leaders have yet again set themselves apart by their definitions of necessity in spending, involvement and aid.
Click the links below to read the opposing viewpoints:
Romney’s military plan unsustainable
Peace will only come through strength
